Wednesday, December 31, 2008

Telstra 2 (cont.) and Insurance

More about Telstra’s machinations and their modus operandi, this is more or less similar to other government’s agencies, as well as nongovernmental institutions such as banks or insurances, whose activities could be termed, to say the least, inconsistent if not criminal. All of them do resort to outright criminal activities wherever they can; subtle blackmail is as criminal as the outright one, the difference being only technical and subject to debating about a degree of criminality. Their lawyers and the rest of those non-productive parasites called professionals are employed by those big sharks, mentioned above, to enforce the threat: most of people succumb under such circumstances, because there are very few brave and honest lawyers around who would be ready to challenge the government or its agency.

It is legally unacceptable to send out 3 different executioners for the same matter at the same time, and handle the matter directly on the top of it all at the same time; not only it confuses the matter but can be interpreted, and it is interpreted by me, as a “good try”. Telstra (Australian Telecommunication Company) did just that: they have (a) sent me an official new bill; (b) engage the lawyers from Melbourne, to whom I have replied and posted the reply in the previous blog (2 December, 2008); (c) engage debt collector ,,, all at the same time. This is illegal, any lawyer should know that. If I have had succumb or fallen victim to confusion and pay the money, I would be breaking the law; and maybe charged with complicity in some other crime that I have no notion of. How do I know what their real activity is and what is only the façade?

Now comes the icing on the cake: The debt collector has broken the law, regardless of with or without Telstra’s knowledge or approval. The man came here under false pretence of being sent by State Housing Authority (he did not even know a new name of the Authority) to inspect the apartment, but in fact he has been making the inventory. This sort of activity is regarded as a criminal activity and has no bearing in any court, because of the very fact that the would-be-evidence is acquired illegally; more so, this sort of activity is counter productive. Many times did happen in the past and still happens these days too, that police would break into a property without a valid warrant and collect real evidence, but it would be thrown out of court because of being illegally acquired.

Not only Telstra (with or without their knowledge) resorts to spying (or evaluating assets of their victims, as they would argue), but Centrelink too; Centrelink’s spying activity was rebuked by their own Authorized Review Officer (ARO) and put aside as not valid evidence, or better as illegally acquired evidence that did not prove one single speck of me breaking any law, but did prove then as those who were breaking law. All those governmental agencies and private-government ventures as well as bigger corporations that are ruling the rulers are keen to provoke their subjects (citizens) into succumbing and thus breaking the law: no honest and dignified person can break law, but only those worms who could be forced to do something that is not right or honest; only those individuals that can be blackmailed and forced into the crime, mainly because they are ignorant of what the right or wrong is. Law can be interpreted differently by everyone, but is must agree with the conscience of the person; Ask me and I shall tell you more:

Today is 31 December 2008 and paid a visit to an insurance office. I have something to say here about an insurance company; the name of the insurance company shall be suppressed for the time being, but will be revealed at the time of relating the full account. In short, a pensioner is director of the company on voluntary basis, whereas he is entitled to some wage that he does not collect. However, it happened that he injured his little finger and needed to visit doctors. He did not draw any wages and claim any compo, just doctors’ bills to be paid. Insurance did pay bills alright, but one bill was let to be paid by the worker, not by the company; it was addressed to the worker, i.e. to the pensioner. Meanwhile the man got broke, and asked the insurance person if he could take that compo payment, as wages, to which the insurance person promptly responded that in that case she must report it to Centrelink, which I wonder if she should, as a matter of being consistent, every claim report to Centrelink. I know the answer and every intelligent person knows it: it is just a subtle blackmail that shall deter the claimant from his demand to which he responded accordingly, as one can see.

One wonders, what Centrelink has to do with this or any other insurance company? I am not sure about other companies, up till I check it up, but I see the similar modus operandi: they all use blackmail as a way to get rich. But, whether they realize it or not, they give the idea away to all those who can think and who have time for thinking; they can distract and fool many, but not all. Just like Centrelink, they also, relay heavily on their arbitrary bodies which, as the person describes it, is like a newspaper team, that shall look at the same evidence as they are looking now: no second opinion. That is, if one wants to make official complaint; until then, one have to bear excruciating pain and live in agony; and after then, because not being able to present his case in a proper court of law, one has no choice but continue to live in agony. But, because they made a little mistake, by sending the bill to injured worker, they will have to approach that person and try to negotiate a deal; that is much cheaper for them (the whole system is included) than to change this idyllic system through which they are able to rip off their victims, peacefully. I am sure they do not want me to write the full account.

I think that is enough for now. Plenty is left for other occasion. I will tell my story in time to come. I would like to wish you all a prosperous and a Happy New Year, 2009. I wish for myself to be able to accomplish a business in Texas for a person in need, which will cost me about $5,000 (about five thousand dollars). I must go there at the end of February or very beginning of March, 2009. Could anyone help, either by donating or by lending?

31. XII. 2008.


Tuesday, December 2, 2008

Telstra ...

Telstra and the "government-private partnership"

A letter sent to Telstra's lawyers in Melbourne

D&B Ref.: 6344029

2 December 2008

Dear Sir/Madam,

Thank you for contacting me; after a few attempts with some other lawyer firms, debt-collecting company, threats with the credit bureau and so forth, Telstra has made another futile attempt in collecting money for non existent services, which shall be explained to you in the pages that follows. The factual truth is different of the one that your client pictures to you, and I am more than willing and ready to prove it in a court of law; I would gladly sue your client already if I had a slightest chance to do that, i.e. money and a brave attorney to take the case in. Futile is their effort, because they try to find suckers who will clean the dirty mess they have done.

The fact is that they owe me $287 for the service they did not provide. At the time I did not have a chance to dispute it properly because I have lost my payment receipt; and their operator told me that I did not pay, and that was it. Later I have found the receipt and have it now scanned in my computer; however, in the midst of dispute I have cancelled all service, because the service was not only nonexistent but much worse (on for a little time than turned off, because of “the bill being not paid” … and again on and off), which in the mean time caused a total collapse of the whole structure that I was building … which about I am not at liberty to talk here, but to mention that to me is more worth than everything in the world.

But they continued sending bill for the next month $253.39; that is for the time that neither phone nor the broadband was connected. I would like to see that. I have sent a complaint to Telecommunications Ombudsman in Melbourne, nut they have directed me back to Telstra and gave me their registration number; because Telstra has no office these days where one could speak to them, I was not able to contact them … nor am I inclined, to tell the truth. I just want to use this chance to tell you that Telstra owes me big money and it is long overdue. On the top of that, they are involved in criminal activities, as spying on people like me for example; I know, you might think that I am paranoid and suffering under delusion of grandeur, and I can tell you that even writing this letter to you and urbi at orbi makes me being different from the rest of the populace, sets me apart from the rest. They can check for bugs and de-bug; can they bug, if necessary?

If anyone is in doubt about “government-private partnerships” then it is necessary to reiterate its modus operandi; Telstra is just one of such enterprises, along with Centrelink, Public Transport Authority, State Housing Authority and more, just does enter my mind at the moment. Al these “government-private partnerships” enterprises are strategically key public services without which the society cannot function and whoever runs those departments can exert a force on public, can actually blackmail the public, take away any choice; with free choice taken away, there is freedom taken away too. All those “private partners” work under protection of government; under protection of people they loot. All of them have arranged their activities away from people’s basic democratic and legal institutions, so all disputes are solved internally and never hit the public eye. Ombudsman will send you back to Telstra as Social Security Appeal Tribunal will send you back to ARO and so the game is going in circles. Of course, they are all working “independently” from government, which I am sure they do.

And here is the catch: in a democratic society based in freedom, a government must or at least should be the choice of the people, where the freedom itself is expressed in a free choice, to come in power, and thus it cannot take the choice and freedom away from public in all its entirety; but through the “government-private partnerships”, not only is freedom taken away from the people, but the government is in fact a puppet government in hands of interests those not of people but somebody else’s. And if you are finding it difficult to recognize those behind the scene, then I shall help you in the search for the truth: take good look at the Buckingham Palace.

It is not only Australia in that position: United States of America is in even worse position, because they have really swallow everything, hook and sinker, and the rod too, lulling themselves in illusion that they are fighting their war, for America, whereas they are fighting the war for mother England that wants dissolve or put under control the United States.

IMPORTANT NOTICE: Except for recipient’s address at the top of this letter, the rest of this letter in its entirety shall also be published at: and any correspondence hereafter that I might find fit. It shall appear in my newsletter about government and its agencies: “URBI ET ORBI”. Therefore, since I am a pensioner and my correspondence with you will be in a open domain, accessible to everyone, I am not at a total liberty of saying everything but just enough to supply you with basic info about the case you handle; I can see that Telstra did not supply you with the truthful info, but just with uncompleted data, thus making you an accomplice in their dirty business.

“Telstra and the government-private partnerships” is the title of this letter.